Patients have the right to make informed decisions about their healthcare. When a medical professional fails to adequately warn a patient about known risks associated with a procedure, medication, or treatment, it can lead to devastating consequences. These situations often fall under a specific type of medical malpractice known as a failure to warn.
Understanding what constitutes failure to warn, the legal standards that apply, and how a medical malpractice lawyer could help is critical for anyone considering a claim. Here are a few things you need to know before you speak with your lawyer about Uniondale failure to warn medical malpractice cases.
Healthcare providers have a legal obligation to inform patients about the risks, benefits, side effects, and alternative options for medical treatment. Providers have a duty to provide informed consent. Patients cannot consent to a procedure or treatment unless they are fully aware of the consequences.
Common examples of failure to warn in Uniondale medical malpractice cases include surgical risks. For instance, a surgeon may fail to disclose the risk of stroke associated with a procedure. If the patient suffers a stroke following the operation, they may claim that they would not have chosen to undergo surgery if they had known the risks. Failure to warn may also apply to medication side effects or alternative treatment options.
Failure to warn medical malpractice claims in Uniondale must meet several legal elements under New York law. The injured patient must prove that a doctor-patient relationship existed and that there was a specific failure to disclose risks. The patient must also demonstrate that they would have declined or altered the treatment if they had been informed. Then, the patient must demonstrate that measurable harm resulted, warranting financial damages.
New York law imposes strict filing deadlines on medical malpractice claims, generally requiring that a lawsuit be filed within two years and six months of the date of the alleged malpractice. Delays can jeopardize a patient’s ability to recover compensation.
Failure to warn claims are complex because they often hinge on hypothetical decisions. For instance, the patient may have refused treatment if they had known the risks. However, this can be difficult to prove. Defense attorneys often argue that the patient would have proceeded regardless or that the risk was so obvious that disclosure was unnecessary.
An experienced Uniondale medical malpractice lawyer plays a critical role in building a strong failure to warn case. Specific ways an attorney could assist include a review of medical records and consultation with expert witnesses. These steps can help fight back against the arguments of the defense.
Failure to warn cases are about negligence, but they are also about a fundamental violation of patient rights. Patients should not be robbed of the ability to make informed choices about their bodies and their futures.
Anyone who suspects they have been harmed because a healthcare provider failed to warn them properly should consult an experienced lawyer immediately. Legal professionals could assess the situation and provide guidance for the way forward for Uniondale failure to warn medical malpractice cases.
No. Our injury cases are handled on a contingent retainer. You pay nothing upfront, and we recover attorney’s fees only if your litigation is successful. We don’t bill by the hour. You don’t need to worry about running up a large attorney’s bill before you see any recovery for your injuries.
Yes. Our firm is dedicated to creating a strong relationship with our clients, beginning with keeping your information and consultation confidential.
Each case we encounter is carefully screened and evidence scrutinized to make sure the claim is meritorious and may be successful at trial. We will perform an investigation, and then our partners make a final decision on whether to take on a case.